Insights
Insights
KPMG reports, M&A trends, and owner exit stories — read the market with our specialists.
In the Agentic Payments Era, Are Financial Firms and Retailers Looking in the Same Direction?
In the agentic payments era, are financial firms and retailers looking in the same direction?
“Agentic payments” — where an AI agent handles everything from product discovery to checkout — is becoming reality. Fast, easy, secure payment is no longer a differentiator; it is the default. According to a KPMG International survey of 500 global financial firms and 500 retail/consumer-goods companies, the two industries are heading toward the same destination — “payment modernization” — but are looking at different points along the way.
Mismatched problem definitions. Retail and consumer-goods firms cite the biggest challenges as fragmented legacy infrastructure (48%) and limited consumer-data access (54%). Financial firms cite these at just 27% and 35% respectively — a roughly 20-percentage-point perception gap. There is also a mismatch in the opposite direction: cross-border payments (40%) and cost/fee transparency (56%), which financial firms emphasize, are lower priorities for retailers (4% and 22% respectively).
Mismatch in payment methods. The temperature gap is starkest in the payment methods to be adopted next.
Retailers feel that tokenized payments (+38ppt), BNPL (+25ppt), and stored wallets (+24ppt) are still underdeveloped. By contrast, biometrics (-64ppt), in-app payments (-48ppt), and real-time cross-border payments (-39ppt) — which financial firms have invested in heavily — rank far lower among retailers' priorities. Financial supply and retail demand point in opposite directions.
Ecosystem building is the battlefield. 51% of financial firms said “the future winner of the payments industry will be whoever builds the ecosystem.” 47% of retail and consumer-goods companies expect to partner with multiple payment-service providers within the next five years. Partnerships spanning fintechs, technology providers, and even regulators — beyond bilateral cooperation — themselves become competitiveness.
M&A implications. This structure points to three M&A directions in payments. First, financial firms are likely to acquire targets with tokenization, BNPL, and wallet capabilities to close the supply-demand mismatch. Second, retail and consumer-goods companies will expand strategic investment in fintech bolt-ons or payment-data analytics solutions to modernize their own payment infrastructure and implement embedded finance. Third, in an ecosystem-driven competition, “capability combinations” — not “standalone capabilities” — determine valuation. Demand for deal sourcing and positioning advisory at the finance–retail intersection will rise along this trend.